Sunday, 7 September 2014

White Genocide in Britain

Well here is one example of what I consider potential genocide:
I live in Kent, which is known as the Garden of England. In my district (Dover District), the council's core strategy (still awaiting approval) envisages the building of over 14,000 more houses by 2026. Our district population is around 100,000, so this would imply migration to our area of tens of thousands of people within just 12 years from now.

We do have plenty of empty houses for sale and for rent, and even empty shops, so clearly there is no lack of accommodation for the local residents or for people who might wish to move here. Indeed this can be ascertained by simply looking at the available housing in the many estate agencies here.

My point of reasoning is as follows:
a significant increase in the population MUST require a proportionate increase in farming to supply food. However, the new homes would be built on farm and woodland, even on an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and on a Scheduled Ancient Monument area (Western Heights Napoleonic defences).

Meanwhile, the Government has designated the WHOLE of Dover District for fracking of shale gas AND shale oil, because the energy resources Britain currently relies upon are dwindling.

So, if some time in the future we had a worldwide - or regional - weather disaster, such as prolonged floods or drought, or volcanic ashes from Iceland causing a drastic drop in temperature (which researchers believed happened at some point in the Bronze Age), we could find ourselves with MANY more people living here due to mass migration policies to our area, and LESS farm and woodland to cater for our food requirements and to absorb torrential rains.

Add to this, that the 2010 election promise to introduce the Localism Bill that would enable BINDING referendums on important local issues, such as urban/rural development, was totally scrapped in November 2011 in the House of Lords.
So NO democratic vote on our future, on whether we actually WANT such a massive influx of migration to our area.

Yes, we could be faced with even mass destruction of our soil through mass-fracking for shale gas and shale oil. Yes we could die a collective death! 

Written by D. Alexander

Monday, 5 May 2014

Scotland and the Public Debt

Scotland’s Vote on Independence
Scotland is preparing to vote on separation from the rest of the current Union of Britain. If the majority chose independence from Westminster, would the Government of a depleted Union try to impose a share of the public (or national) debt on Scotland? The figure could amount to around £130 billion, which is 10% of the national debt. If so, Scotland would be bankrupted from the start.

Britain’s public debt is £1.3 trillion; that is one thousand three hundred billion pounds. One billion is one thousand million, so we have a picture of what our national debt looks like. Distributed among everyone resident in Britain, that would be around twenty thousand pounds per person, adult or child without exception.

Impossible to Pay the Public Debt
It is impossible to repay this sum, and indeed in 2014 Britain will pay around £60 billion alone on interest on the national debt. Since the Coalition came to power in May 2010, this debt has increased by 80%, and it is steadily going up. It is estimated that by May 2015, in time for the next general election, it will have doubled since 2010.

This debt bubble will burst when the Government - whichever government that be – decides to officially declare the State insolvent. This will mean that Britain will default on repayment of government bonds, which constitute the national debt. The reason is that further austerity to cut state spending would rapidly bring Britain into the situation Greece is in and even worse. And there is no bailout forthcoming as most countries in Europe are in a similar situation to Britain with an enormous national debt, as too is the United States of America, where the debt has surpassed the $17 trillion mark.

As the national debt rises, so too will the annual interest the State must pay. Government bonds earn nearly 5% a year on interest, which is almost three times higher than Britain’s current 2% rate of inflation.  

Scotland Would Gain Nothing
Will Scotland accept to take on a share of Westminster’s public debt sheet? To do so would be tantamount to bankrupting the Scottish Nation. To remain a part of the current Union implies bankruptcy anyway. So what is the point in breaking away if that means transferring to Scotland an immense burden that the Country could never pay off, a ball and chain the weight of which would increase exponentially, as it does anyway under Westminster’s governance? 
There would be no point in it!

If Scotland kept the English pound it would make the Country liable to the national debt that is attached to this currency. While in theory Scottish oil and gas revenues would no longer go directly to Westminster’s treasury, taking on a share of Britain’s national debt, however, would sponge away all these revenues and much more. In fact, a significant part of Scottish revenues would be needed to service Westminster’s public debt requirements. Alone the interest on a £130 billion Scottish share of the public debt would require Scotland handing over six and a half billion pounds a year to the British Treasury.

Written by D. Alexander

Wednesday, 9 April 2014

Afghanistan: BNP Campaigned for British Soldiers

British National Party: Friends of our Brave Soldiers
In 2010, I signed a British National Party petition demanding that our soldiers be withdrawn from Afghanistan immediately. Thousands of people in Britain signed this petition. We did so because we believed our soldiers were being uselessly sacrificed by the Government.
The Government turned away and refused our request, and continued with the useless and pointless sacrifice of our dear soldiers in Helmand, Afghanistan.

Dr Mike Martin
Now it has emerged that British soldiers were indeed fighting a war in Afghanistan that was so utterly wrong, that the local Afghan population in Helmand were of the opinion the British Government had colluded with the Taliban to destroy Helmand province as well as the lives of hundreds of British soldiers.

The Ministry of Defence (MoD) is now trying to supress the revelations made by Dr Mike Martin, whose research indicates that the British Government did not have a clue what the war in Helmand was about.

Sky News has published the following article, dated 9 April 2014, giving insight into the shocking reality of Britain’s lost war in Afghanistan.   

The following is the copy of the BNP petition 2010 to bring British soldiers home from Afghanistan.

And here is an article on the BNP website highlighting the handing over of the petition at 10 Downing Street in March 2011.

The following article highlights the response from the Government to BNP’s request.

Written by D. Alexander

Saturday, 22 March 2014

How the British Economy Makes Lots of Money

The following is a brief guide on how money is made:

You need a central bank, plenty of paper and some ink. A silver lining through each note and a watermark will distinguish it from monopoly money.

An even quicker way is to type in some figures on a keyboard that will transmit to a computer’s hard disk, and the central bank has just created digital money. Since January 2009, the Bank of England created £375 billion in digital money using precisely this method.

Sadly, the British economy is calculated in terms of how to make money, lots of it, and very quickly. It is one reason why City bankers can give themselves big salaries and top them up once a year with even bigger bonuses. They may cause the banks to crash, as happened in 2007 and 2008, and so-by risk causing the whole economy to crash too. 
But when this happens, the Bank of England, which is our central bank, will use some paper and ink, or a keyboard, to replenish the banks and the economy, and everything will return to normal: top salaries, bonuses and the high life of Riley. These salaries in fact will be increased with a vengeance, so the City bankers will always come out of it on top.
So now we know how to make plenty of money. It’s so easy, it’s a joke.

What Is this Money Worth?
The money circulated by the Bank of England is not really worth anything, because it has nothing to back it, meaning it is not even worth the paper it is printed on. Then there is the fact that hundreds of billions of pounds of it is digital, whereby it exists only on computer screens animated by a hard disk.     

If you had gone to an English market stall one hundred years ago and tried purchasing some items with a piece of paper worth nothing, they would have positively believed you were cracking a joke. You’d have been expected to pay with silver coins, copper coins, or a banknote to which corresponded a set amount of gold stored away in a vault in the Bank of England.

As it stands today, our money does not correspond to any assets which can guarantee its value, meaning the British State is printing money that is worth nothing. Although the Bank of England does hold around $15 billion US worth of our national gold reserves (around £10 billion), this amount would only suffice to cover a fraction of the currency in circulation in Britain. By contrast, the British Treasury does hold £1.3 trillion in public debt!

France and Italy each hold gold reserves about eight times higher than Britain does, even though the population of each of these countries is about the same as Britain’s. Germany’s gold reserves are even greater, and all Eurozone countries together could probably prop up their common currency, the euro, with enough gold to prevent it from crashing in time of a financial crisis, which could happen if confidence in paper currencies suddenly collapsed.

Britain’s pound, though, would be in a woeful position. It would literally fall to shreds on the currency exchange, imports would become extremely expensive including oil and gas, and even a Chinese T shirt would become unaffordable.

Confidence in the Present Monetary System
We need to understand that most of the money in circulation in Britain has not been printed – either in paper form or in a digital version – by the Bank of England, but has been “created” and lent out in the form of loans by commercial banks, meaning that commercial banks electronically create money that does not, at least in theory, really exist.

This particular detail is important, especially if we consider that the pound’s value in relation to other currencies is calculated in accordance with the amount of pounds issued by the central bank, which is the Bank of England, and not in relation to the amount of pounds “created” by the commercial banks.

So we know the secret to creating lots of money, it’s quite simple: the Bank of England and the commercial banks do it all the time. We should also have understood that this money is guaranteed by the sole paper it is printed on, or by a computer’s hard disk, plus a gigantic public debt of £1.3 trillion, and an official private debt also of £1.3 trillion. Actually the private debt in Britain is believed to be a lot higher.

All this does not inspire confidence, so we may legitimately accept that our present monetary system could simply fall down overnight like a pack of cards once the door opens and a slight breeze enters the room. That is, once confidence in monopoly-style money is no longer forthcoming.

Written by D. Alexander

Britain's Economic Recovery Prediction:

Thursday, 6 March 2014

Crimea Is Now Part of Russia

On Thursday 6th March 2014, the Crimean Parliament voted in favour of Crimea becoming a part of Russia. The decree is with immediate effect, meaning that Ukraine has no jurisdiction within Crimean territory.

The Crimean Parliament also decreed that on 16th March 2014 a referendum shall be held in Crimea on the issue, and that this will serve to ratify the decision already taken by the Crimean Parliament.

Thursday, the Day Crimea Returned to Russia
Thursday 6th March 2014 is the day Crimea’s Parliament democratically voted to end Ukrainian rule over Crimean territory, so on 16th March the People of Crimea will be voting on Russian soil to ratify their Parliament’s decree. They will be asked whether they want their land to remain Russian soil, or to become Ukrainian.

Written by D. Alexander

On 16th March 2014, well over 80% of the population of Crimea turned out to vote in the referendum, and 96% of the voters chose Russia as their Motherland, voting for the reunification of Crimea with Russia.
Within days the Russian Parliament welcomed back Crimea to Russia.

Britain and Russia are Allied Nations. Our Christian Faith is essential in the Alliance between our British Motherland and the Russian Motherland.
No-one can break these ties! 

Monday, 24 February 2014

Forecasting Britain’s Imminent Financial Collapse

The End of the Union of Britain
The increase of Britain’s national debt is many times higher than the inflation rate. This debt has gone up by around 80% from May 2010 to February 2014. Our national debt has passed from around £750 billion to almost £1.3 trillion in less than four years. 

The annual interest on government bonds is almost 5%, so in 2010 we paid around £35 billion on interest on our national debt. In 2014 it will be around £60 billion, and that is just the interest. You will notice that the increase in the public debt is way above the annual inflation rate of 3%, and well above the 5% interest rate on government bonds. This is proof that the Chancellor is utterly out of touch with reality and has been taking us all for a ride for almost four years.

Now have you tried calculating the entity of Britain’s imminent financial crash? It is simple: look no further than Scotland for the answer. In fact, the current Union of Britain may break up in order to avoid the burden of the public debt.  

Scotland to Wave Good-Bye to National Debt
Why would Alex Salmond be so keen to keep the English pound in an independent Scotland? Well he knows the answer from Westminster will be negative, so he feigns betrayal and declares that if Scotland cannot keep the English pound sterling after independence, Scotland will not be obliged to partake in a share of Britain’s public debt. Genius!

Yes, Alex Salmond knows that Britain’s public debt, currently at £1.272 trillion, that is one trillion and 272 billion English pounds, is impossible to service, and he has worked out the stratagem to relieve Scotland of any participation in Britain’s coming financial crash. He doesn’t really want Parliament in London to accept his demand for Scotland to keep the Bank of England pound; instead he wants an excuse for Scotland to be relieved of this burden – by none other than English leaders – and Scotland will be debt-free!

British Parliament have already stated that an independent Scotland cannot keep the English pound, and Mr. Salmond has already made clear that Scotland, consequently, will not inherit any part of Britain’s national debt.

Of-course Scotland’s economy would flourish after an independence vote with no English pound and no public debt. But does anyone seriously believe that the Coalition of jokers that would govern the rest of this Country of ours will be able to continue increasing the public debt and inflicting on us an annual payment – in interest alone – of £60 billion, £75 billion, £90 billion … as each year passes? 

Let’s not forget that the public debt increases at a level way above inflation. Indeed what remained of Britain would inherit Scotland’s share in the national debt, and that could be around £130 billion. The North Sea oil and gas revenues, however, could no longer be used to increment the national Treasury in London, as they would go to Scotland exclusively.

The Government to Confiscate British Savings?
So how long will it take before a desperate government in London decides to enact the Cyprus experiment and confiscate all personal savings above, let’s say, £20,000? Currently there is an EU law allowing the government to confiscate all private savings that exceed 100,000 euro or the equivalent, which in Britain is about £87,000. So the law is already there to go ahead and do it.

Alex Salmond is not a stupid man. He is a cunning statesman who has found a way to detract Scotland from the guaranteed financial collapse that shall visit Britain in the very near future. But we south of the Wall will be left with a pack of 52 jokers, plus two more jokers, the PM and the Chancellor.

The public debt will not be solved by confiscating private savings above £87,000, and not even above £20,000. It would just be a respite to the clueless Treasurer in London and the Prime Minister to hold out for a few more years until the national debt is back there again where it was, at well over one trillion pounds.  

Will England Leave the Union?
So now we may ask the question whether England’s shires will leave the Union too. We could all leave the national debt to the City of London and Buckingham Palace, we could run our own affairs and need not send a penny to a bankrupt Treasury. 
We would prosper! 
The British Union needs to be founded anew, but without the present Establishment 

Written by D. Alexander

How the British economy makes lots of money

Wednesday, 12 February 2014

BNP to Win General Election

The British National Party appears poised to win the next British General Election going by exclusion of all other political party policies.

Nothing but Failed Policies
The three parties that have dominated Britain’s parliament and formed successive governments have just about exhausted every attempt to hide the inevitable: an imminent financial collapse.
This collapse has to come owing to one essential factor, namely the fact that Britain’s public debt is unserviceable under current criteria. The national State budget is weighed down by an annual expense of well over £50 billion to cover just the interest on the public debt, without even mentioning how much money is spent on servicing the actual debt. In order to repay government bonds to investors once they mature, the Treasury has to borrow at least the same amount of money through the sale of new bonds. Add to that the interest, which is around 5% yearly, and the Treasury is beyond repair.

Even more money is borrowed each year by the British Government in order to cover the massive costs of unemployment-related benefits and child allowance, as well as state pensions, plus the £43 million net that Britain must hand over each day to the European Union. Adding to this, Britain must pay billions of pounds a year on foreign aid to non EU countries.

All three mainstream parties: Labour, the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives, staunchly believe that mass immigration is the only solution to solving Britain’s problems, and since May 2010, when the Conservative and LibDem coalition came to power, immigration to Britain has increased above the levels they were under Labour. This sheer madness policy means that Britain’s liabilities on unemployment-related benefits, child benefits and housing benefits have long passed the point of no return.
Basically, we are a ruined Nation.

At present, Britain’s public (or national) debt is almost £1.3 trillion. It increases all the time, by the minute. It has almost doubled since May 2010, in just over three and a half years.

Britain's national debt in real-time figures:

British National Party Is Only Remaining Option
Once the financial collapse comes, it will be clear to the British public that never again can faith be placed in a policy of reckless money-borrowing to finance mass immigration and the relentless payment of unbearable tributes to the European Union. One reason being, someone has to repay the borrowed money. This borrowed money is the public debt, and alone its annual interest is impossible to pay, let alone the actual debt.

Another reason is that European Union membership and mass immigration have flooded Britain with millions of people and with endless disagreements with a foreign parliament and a foreign, non-elected dictatorial commission, which is the European Commission that rules Britain and all European Union member states.    

In short, BNP will offer Britain sovereign independence from foreign domination and from mass immigration.

Written by D. Alexander