Will There Be Another Pope?

The pope has said he is going to resign on 28^th February 2013. It will be interesting to see whether another pope will be elected to take his place.

St. Peter's Successor

St. Peter is one of the twelve disciples of Jesus, but he did not write a version of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Peter called Mark his “son”, thus giving him the spiritual title of disciple and successor to his own Apostolic ministry.

Saint Mark the Evangelist, son of Peter, wrote the first version of the Gospel. Mark was not one of the Twelve, as he had not been a direct follower of Jesus, and what he wrote in his version of the Gospel, was imparted to him by Peter the Apostle.

The Gospel according to St. Mark is the Petrine version of the Word and Deeds of Jesus Christ.

The Synoptic Line of Succession

St. Matthew and St. Luke each structured their own version of the Gospel upon that of Mark the first Evangelist, so-by presenting us with a synoptic succession of the Petrine version of the Word of Jesus. Matthew and Luke also included in their presentation of the Scripture information that was not present in Mark's version. Much of this added information is about the birth and infancy of Jesus, and appears to have been directly given them by the Virgin Mary, Mother of Christ.

Matthew and Luke succeeded Mark in his Apostolic mission and built upon it, further edifying the House of Jesus Son of God.

Saint John the Evangelist

St. John wrote the fourth version of the Gospel, and being one of the twelve disciples of Jesus, he did not need to “succeed” Peter, but presented his Scripture based on its own structure, as a direct witness to Christ. For this reason, his book is not part of the synoptic cycle of the Gospel.

In the Gospel according to St. John, Jesus began to openly reveal himself to the People at a wedding in the town of Cana in Galilee. There his Mother said to him: “They have no wine left.”

Despite Jesus' protestations, She went on to say to the servants: “Do whatever he tells you.”

This, according to St. John, is the command from Mary, the Virgin Mother of Jesus, that initiated the preaching of the Reign of God to the Galileans.

Who Are the Popes?

The Catholic Church does not recognise St. Mark as the Successor to Peter the Apostle, but starts its line of successors with Linus. One Linus is briefly mentioned by St. Paul in one of his epistles, but nowhere is he mentioned in the New Testament as St. Peter's successor to the Apostolic Church.

None of the people listed in the Vatican's line of succession to the ministry of St. Peter contributed to the New Testament, and yet the Catholic Church declares them as the successors of Peter, while not acknowledging Mark the Evangelist as Peter's declared son and successor.

The Holy Scriptures

The Gospel could not have prevailed if the New Testament had not been written in writing by the four Evangelists. These Evangelists were members of the Priesthood of Jesus Christ, and they wrote either what they personally had witnessed of the Son of God, or that which others who did personally witness him taught them.

A Word from a Lady In High came thus:

people must love the words which the priests speak of Jesus from the Holy Scriptures.

Written by D. Alexander

See also:
celticbritannia.blogspot.com/2011/12/mark-son-of-peter-apostle.html

The EU Meat Scandal

Are we fed on rubbish due to EU regulation?

“The Polish product was labeled as beef offcuts – slaughterhouse leftovers – that the Irish plants used as cheap filler material in budget-priced burgers”.

The statement from the Irish Agriculture Department comes after DNA testing in Ireland in January and February 2013 revealed a colossal meat scandal within the European Union. The Irish Police are investigating, and Ireland's government has announced that DNA testing revealed that meat offcuts imported to Ireland from Poland, and labeled as beef, in reality contain up to 75% horse meat.

What Rubbish Are People Being Fed on?

The very first question we should ask, is why the people of countries that are members of the European Union are being fed on cheap filler material in “budget-priced burgers”. Offcuts and leftovers from slaughterhouses are being sent from one end of the European Union to the other and processed as “integral food”, to be then sold at cheap prices to an impoverished population that does not really know what is landing on their plate.

These leftovers include horse meat, which costs a fraction of beef.

How much nasty fat is contained in cheap filler material offered to the impoverished populace in EU countries? What actually are the cutoffs and leftovers being fed to the people, even when the product really does contain only “beef”?

Mountains of integrated EU regulations, and cheap grub-meal, with cheap, nasty leftover by-products being transported from one corner of the EU to the other and sold for Public consumption!

The Meat Scandal Spreads Through the EU

Soon after Ireland announced the first discovery of horse meat in beef burgers in January 2013, DNA tests on meat samples were made in Britain, where Irish beef products are imported, and it led to the discovery of a large-scale fraud consisting of fake preprepared beef meals being sold in the form of burgers, lasagne and spaghetti bolognese in some of Britain's major super-market chains, with up to 100% horse meat being found in some of the items that were analysed.

It has been revealed that some of the cheap filler material comes from France, and that a French food producer imported it from Romania. To then sell some of it on to Britain. According to Reuters on 9 February 2013, “French Consumer Affairs Minister Benoit Hamon said an investigation had found that the horse meat had originated in Romania, although there were links with French, Dutch and Cypriot firms and a factory in Luxembourg".

Reuters reports that a French food manufacturer had “recalled lasagne and two other products after discovering that they included horse meat from Romania rather than beef from France as it had thought”.

One director general of a French food processor stated: “we thought we had certified French beef in our products. But in reality, we were supplied with Romanian horse meat. We have bee deceived”.

EU Consumption Policies Based on Ideological Dogma

The public in any country that is an EU member state is still deceived into believing that what they purchase as “made in their own country”, really is a home-made product. But EU ideology aims at making all member states artificially interdependent on each other.

The carbon footprint, meant to reduce transport distances from the producer to the consumer, is an enemy of EU policy, as too is the label saying “made in your own country”.

The European Union leaders are out to destroy sovereignty and sanity and replace it with an unending stream of transport vehicles carrying supplies from one end of Europe to the other, and even across the sea to Britain and Ireland: products that used to be, and could be, produced at home, in each individual country.

This is why the Public at large in Ireland, Britain, France and … who knows where else … is discovering that cheap leftovers from Polish and Romanian abattoirs are landing on their plate under the guise of “meat”, and that horse meat is being sold as “beef”.

Written by D. Alexander

See also:
celticbritannia.blogspot.com/2011/07/fast-food-meat-diet.html

Britain's Economic Recovery Prediction 2013

The British economy may experience significant recovery in 2013 owing to a series of circumstances related to the pound sterling.

Predicted UK Economic Improvement

One of the biggest problems weighing down the UK economy is the over-valued pound sterling. As the pound is basically a debt-based currency with no real support to uphold its artificially high value, it is likely to drastically fall against other major currencies on the exchange market, and this downgrading of the British currency will probably come about as a result of continuing economic collapse.

The positive aspect in this is that it will determine a marked fall in UK unemployment and an increase in exports. Imports will fall, the trade deficit will become narrower and possibly even turn in Britain's favour, becoming a trade surplus. There are some very good reasons to support the view that the super-pound, one of the biggest woes affecting the United Kingdom's economy, is finally about to undergo a thorough shearing process, reflecting more the image of a down-to-earth British pound than the hitherto overgrown sheep disguised as a lamb as we currently know it.

Britain's Gold Reserves

The UK's gold reserves amount to 310 tonnes all weighed and counted. This is a far cry from Germany's 3,400 tonnes of gold reserves, Italy's 2,450 and France's 2,435 tonnes. Even Portugal has 382 tonnes of gold reserves, 72 more than Britain, while the Netherlands have 612 tonnes, almost twice the amount the UK can boast of. Portugal and the Netherlands both have a significantly smaller population – and economy – than Britain, too!

And the United States of America can account for over 8,000 tonnes of gold reserves.

The logical conclusion in the comparison of gold stocks is that the pound sterling is unable to fall back on a monetary back-up system, whereas Italy and France, which each have a population and an economy similar in size to Britain's, both have eight times more gold reserves. These two countries, and also Germany and the Unites States of America, could use their gold stocks to back up their currencies, namely the euro and the US dollar. The USA could even use their enormous strategic reserves of oil and gas as a supplementary backup to further strengthen the dollar, whereas the now defunct British Empire does not offer Britain any control over the once abundant gold and silver mines that used to fill London's Treasury and palaces.

And how much is gold worth today? Well, with gold steadily increasing in value and close to 2,000 US dollars per ounce, this means that one tonne of gold bullion is worth between 60 and 65 million US dollars.

Revaluation of Currencies

The present financial world crisis is likely to see Britain's major economic competitors use their national gold stocks to support their currencies, thus leaving a debt-based pound with a 1 trillion pound UK Public Debt, a trade deficit and a banking system in rapid decline. Eurozone countries can count on many hundreds of billions of dollars worth of gold bullion, as too the USA, with Britain by comparison reaching a mere $18 billion.

And while Britain's North Sea oil and gas reserves are in dire decline, Greece has oil and gas reserves estimated in trillions of dollars!

So, if the pound sterling should fall in value against the dollar and the euro, perhaps by 50-75%, this should result in Britain's minimum wage, once calculated in euros and zloties, being far too insignificant to attract millions of Eastern Europeans to the UK.

British jobs would go to British people, imports would become too expensive, whereas exports would rise. Unemployment in the UK would fall, and the housing market would be free of the massive influx of Eastern European workers, thus reducing the cost of rent and the cost of mortgages.

The enormous strains on the National Health Service and on education owing to mass immigration would be greatly alleviated, and the costs of the UK benefit system would be enormously reduced as millions of British people find work.

There would be no more incentive for seasonal workers from Eastern Europe to come flocking to the Promised Land of Sheer Bankruptcy and find employment so as to send their income home, while paying hardly any tax worth mentioning on their minimum wage, but exploiting in full every social service offered in the UK.

In short, come the devaluation of the pound sterling, come Prosperity!

 

Written by D. Alexander

David Cameron Promises EU In/Out Referendum

The British Prime Minister David Cameron has announced that the Conservative Party, if elected again into government, will hold an in/out referendum on Britain's membership of the European Union.

Sky News reports on 23^rd of January 2013 that before the next General Election, the Prime Minister will ask the British electorate for a mandate to negotiate new terms with the European Union, and once an agreement is achieved, to hold a referendum.

According to Sky News, David Cameron said: “And when we have negotiated that new settlement, we will give the British people a referendum with a very simple in or out choice to stay in the EU on these new terms; or come out altogether. It will be an in-out referendum.”

However, of utmost importance is the following part of the statement, as reported in Sky News: “The Prime Minister will say legislation for a referendum will be drafted before the next election.”

Currently, there are hundreds of millions of people who have the right to come and settle in the UK, and many have made use of this EU regulation to move here. In particular millions of Eastern Europeans have chosen to move to Britain to find work, yet with an estimated 64 million people, our Country cannot afford to offer millions of jobs to foreign nationals, or cater for their families.

Australia is 25 times larger than Britain but has a population less than one third of the United Kingdom; yet Australia has strict immigration laws to prevent mass immigration. Clearly the Conservative Party, of whom David Cameron is the leader, has realised that European immigration laws would mean the ultimate downfall of our Country if we did not challenge these insane regulations and leave the European Union altogether.

However, Britain could have left the European Union some years ago in return for Prosperity, and the Government is clearly prolonging the agony and making Britain remain in the European Union for years to come, preventing Prosperity, with the intention of remaining in Parliament till May 2015.
From May 2010, that is five years of prolonged agony.
Five years in which the Government rejects all Prosperity and imposes Austerity.

British Party campaigns for Britain to leave the EU NOW, not tomorrow, next year, in 2016, 2017 or 2018.

Written by D. Alexander

See Sky News report:

http://news.sky.com/story/1041580/cameron-to-promise-in-out-eu-referendum

Britain's Celestial Monarchy

Jesus Christ Our Leader

Jesus Son of God was born to the royal House of David to bring Redemption to mankind. Born as King and High Priest to Israel and to all nations on Earth, Jesus is at the head of our Church, of all national Churches of the British Isles. He is our Monarch In High! From the High City of Zion, the Place of the Heavenly Temple, comes Prosperity. Our future Prosperity is with Jesus Son of God.

Our National Flag the Union Jack

Our Union Jack is dedicated to the Christian Faith, bearing the emblems of three Christian Saints. It is the flag of a Christian nation bearing testimony to the Christian Faith and to the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Our future Constitution shall be based upon the Faith in Christ, our Leader and King in High.

The Road to Christ's Church

The road from the Church of our Fair Lady leads to the Foundations of Christ's Church, and upon these foundations our Christian Nation shall prosper. On entering the Church, people are not to make any symbolic signs, nor make any symbolic gesture of crucifixion, for Christ rose from the dead on the third day, he being the Lord of Resurrection.

Inside the Church, people are to listen to the sermon, without talking to one another, for we must love the words which the priests speak of Jesus from the Holy Scriptures. This is the sole Command that we have concerning the sermon.

Our Fair Lady is Mother of Love, and She stands next to the Almighty Father.

Her road leads to Christ's Church.

Written by D. Alexander

UK Unemployment in 2013

The Remedy to Unemployment

Has the British Government found the remedy to solve Britain's unemployment in the year 2013?

The answer is plainly: no!

The Government has no strategy to create jobs and significantly reduce the numbers of people in search of work, neither for the year 2013 nor for any year thereafter. Indeed the numbers of the unemployed in the UK are likely to rise.

However, the Government may be ready to jump on a quarterly decrease in unemployment by, let's say, a few ten thousand people, in order to release big-time statements claiming the “problem is solved” and that the Government was right all along, that Britain is on the road to fantastic recovery.

But seriously, who would believe that?

If there should be a quarterly increase in the unemployment figures, perhaps the Government will place the blame on the euro-zone crisis. Either way, it will not be the fault of the elected authorities, but always someone else's fault.

EU Solution to Unemployment

So let us ask the next best question: does the EU have a solution to unemployment in the year 2013? After all, Britain is a member state of the EU and is regulated by EU employment laws.

The answer is plainly: no!

The European Union does not have a strategy to reduce unemployment, other than millions of Eastern Europeans finding jobs in the western EU countries, including Britain, receiving in return the minimum wage.

Britain to leave the EU in 2013?

So now let us ask the most obvious question: Does the British Government have a plan for Britain to leave the EU in the year 2013?

The answer is simply: no!

The British Government has repeatedly stated that Britain must remain in the EU, and that the European Union must continue to expand. It is widely expected that before long, millions of Bulgarian and Romanian EU citizens will come in mass over to the UK and start searching for minimum wage jobs, competing with the Poles and Baltic citizens.

A new British Government in 2013?

So, in conclusion, we may ask one more question: will Britain have a new Government in the year 2013, a Government that will significantly reduce unemployment in Britain?

The answer here is, although the Government's mandate expires in 2015, the Coalition of Conservatives and LibDems is crumbling, and the Conservative party is crumbling from within, while UKIP's popularity has increased from 3.5% in May 2010 to 14% in November 2012.

Germany 1945 - 1948

So what to do?

Well there is talk in Government circles of replacing jobseekers allowance with a credit card that would see the equivalent to vouchers being given to the unemployed in Britain in place of cash. It would effectively mean unemployed people who are receiving jobseekers allowance would only be able to purchase what is permitted on their credit card, but no alcohol, no tobacco and, most importantly, no drugs.

This is the easiest way out for a failed Government, to place all the blame on the unemployed, and pretend that, with £71 a week, they can afford to buy large quantities of alcohol, tobacco and, yes, drugs. That they are in fact the cause of their own unemployed situation. So why not demand a denazification certificate in order to obtain such a credit card? Alcoholics, drug-addicts, unmentionables. Indeed, untouchables!

Oh, lest we forget, unemployed people in the UK under the age of 25 signing on and receiving jobseekers allowance receive significantly less than £71 a week. And they have already been told by the Government that they will receive less housing benefit, that they should go and live with their parents.

So perhaps "a bad and guilty people" policy and the implied reference to drug-addicts and alcoholics to stigmatise the unemployed in Britain, is the easiest way out for a failed Government. What will come next, mass exile from one third of our lands? And then?

Well hopefully a General Election any time soon, way before the year 2015.

Too many nasty words are being directed at Britain's unemployed people, it has all been seen in history where this leads to eventually, such as in Germany 1918 to 1923 after a nation was devastated by the victors. And the Government has no plan to reduce unemployment, neither in 2013 nor ever. Why would they, if we are treated by them as the despised and guilty people?

British Jobs for Polish People
Tone Blair, Britain's former and worst ever prime minister, is given an award in Poland for giving British jobs to Polish people.
http://news.sky.com/story/1044874/blair-award-for-helping-poles-move-to-uk

And Polish is the second language in Britain, (but in some British factories it is the only spoken language):
http://news.sky.com/story/1045121/polish-is-second-most-common-language

Democracy and Prosperity in 2013

So Democracy should decide. And with Democracy must come illuminated ideas for Britain's future and our Prosperity. These ideas cannot be based on hateful stigmas that shun and humiliate young people and unemployed people in general. Only the Christian Faith can inspire Prosperity. Indeed, all Prosperity comes from High.

So will the Establishment in Britain, with the characteristic human head of the State, that is also head of the Government, the same head that is head of the Church of England, of the Army, and of so much more of our institutions, bow to the High City, so that we can have a new Constitution?

Well, in answer to this, a question: is the Establishment capable of giving us Prosperity? No!

So this leaves the door open to the High City, and in Jesus Christ we remain faithful!

Written by D. Alexander

UK Unemployment in 2012:

celticbritannia.blogspot.com/2011/07/uk-unemployment-in-2012.html

Britannia Fair

The British Isles: Our Celtic Origins

Celtic origins in the British Isles date back thousands of years, emerging from a prehistoric era shrouded in mystery.

The Celtic origins of the people inhabiting the British Isles go back thousands of years, when Celtic was spoken from Kent to Cornwall in the south of England, in Wales – of which the Welsh name is Cymru, in Scotland, and in Ireland.

Prehistoric Populations in Britain and Ireland

Prehistoric populations lived in Britain and Ireland during the Stone Age, the Bronze Age and the Iron Age. The Celts may have been among the first inhabitants, but they could also have arrived at a later time and integrated with older populations. There is no historical evidence to exclude either of these possibilities.

According to John Davies, author of The Celts, until the 1950s, the introduction of the Celtic language to Britain and Ireland was believed to have come about after the seventh century BC as a result of an invasion. The absence of any descriptive historical reference to a Celtic invasion of Bronze Age Britain exposes the invasion theory as speculative, and indeed the author of The Celts notes that archaeological research offers no evidence of significant immigration either in Ireland or Britain during the centuries following 700 BC.

During the first millennium BC, three Celtic populations were established in the British Isles. The Brythonic speaking Celts lived in modern England and Wales. The Goidelic speaking Celts inhabited most of Ireland and the western regions of Scotland, where they became known as Scots, while the Picts had settled in eastern Scotland and in the north of Ireland. Various theories have been presented as to the origins of the Picts and the language they spoke, but a number of factors indicate that they were probably Brythonic speaking Celts.

In the pre-Christian era, the Celts did not make use of an alphabet. As a result, no written documentation can be found to determine the details of the Celtic origins of the peoples of Britain and Ireland. Even the idea that the Brythonic speaking people arrived in a later period than those of Goidelic tongue can not be historically certified.

The oldest reference to the Brythonic people of Britain, or Britons, stems from the voyages of the Greek explorer Pytheas of Marseilles in the fourth century BC. The New Encyclopaedia Britannica describes the Britons as Celts who arrived in Britain at an unknown date, possibly in the seventh or sixth century BC, who beyond doubt mixed with the original inhabitants.

As there are no earlier written references to the Britons, it is impossible to determine when they first became manifest as a distinct people. This is also the case of the Goidelic speaking Celts of Ireland and western Scotland, who may have been living in the British Isles a thousand, or even several thousands of years before the advent of the Christian era.

Linguistic Definition of Celtic

The definition of Celtic in British and Irish history is based mainly upon linguistic considerations, as all the populations of the British Isles were speaking one or other form of Celtic when the Roman Empire came in contact with Britain in the year 43 AD. In The Celts, John Davies notes that the ancestor language of Brythonic could have been spoken in Britain as early as 4000 BC, and that the same could be true of the ancestor language of Irish in Ireland and of Gaulish in Gaul.

Although the British Isles were inhabited thousands of years before the Christian era, nothing is known in regards to the language that the Stone Age and Bronze Age people spoke. If they were not of Celtic origin, then it is certain that the Celtic speech became the language of Britain and Ireland through cultural assimilation. In this case, the people who were not Celts gradually adopted the language that would later be commonly spoken in its various forms.

Brythonic, which was spoken in Britain and probably among the Picts of Scotland and Ireland, is referred to as P Celtic, whereas the Goidelic speaking Irish and the Scots who settled in western Scotland spoke what is known as Q Celtic. The main difference between these two branches of the Celtic language is that the pronunciation of the k sound of the Goidelic tongue becomes a p sound in Brythonic. In addition to this, the f sound in Goidelic is pronounced as gh in Brythonic.

Sources:

• The Celts, by John Davies, based upon the S4C television series The Celts, published by Cassell & Co, 2002 edition;
• New Encyclopaedia Britannica, 15th edition, 2007.

Written by D. Alexander