Britannia's Son

The English Church Conceived in the Spirit

The Fair Lady Britannia is Mother of the English Church that was conceived in the Spirit in Kent during the sixth century. A Kentish prince by the name of Ethelbert, son of Eormenric, married a Frankish princess, Bertha. Princess Bertha carried the Holy Scriptures over to Kent.

Prince Ethelbert later succeeded his father Eormenric and became king of Kent. He restored a Celtic chapel in Canterbury – dedicated to St. Martin of Tours – to its original ecclesiastic function, and he also converted to the Christian Faith of his wife Queen Bertha.

This is how the English Church was conceived in the Spirit in Canterbury, capital of the Kingdom of Kent. The English Church was conceived through a royal marriage, the Gospel and the dedication of a church to the Faith in Christ.

By the time Augustine came to Kent, the English Church had already been established through the Gospel.

The Prosperous English Church

The English Church can prosper because it is built on its original foundations, which came about through the love of a wife for her husband and the love of a husband for his wife. They were united in the Faith in Christ.

The English Church recognises only Jesus Christ Son of God as its sole Leader and Head, and the Holy Scriptures as its sole Doctrine, and only God Almighty as the Holy Father.

This Church shall never fail.  

Written by D. Alexander

The Origins of the English Church
http://celticbritannia.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/origins-of-english-church.html

The English Church
http://celticbritannia.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/the-english-church.html

Britain's Celestial Monarchy
http://celticbritannia.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/britains-celestial-monarchy.html 

UK Parliament Reneges On Democracy

Democracy in Britain is championed by British Party, which aims to include in a new Constitution the right of local communities to call for a referendum on important local issues.

The British Government, and Parliament in general, do not believe in democracy, they are afraid of democratic values and have broken a promise to give the British people a fair say in our own affairs.

In October 2011, the House of Lords removed the flagship 'local referendum' provision from the Localism Bill which would have allowed communities to launch a referendum on any local issue.

http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2011/october/local-referendum-provision-in-localism-bill-is-removed-/

Developers can now go ahead and do as they wish, local Government can do whatever the developers want them to do, enacting the agenda of successive central governments to uproot our farms and woods to accommodate mass immigration and force their EU agenda on us.

They can go ahead inundating our villages, towns and cities with more traffic stemming from more settlements, poisoning the air we breathe with chemical pollution, as whole suburban areas have to be built for millions of people coming over and settling down in Britain.

We have no right to a say in all this, we cannot call for a referendum on any local issue, no matter how important it is and regardless how it may affect the local population. Here is one example: in Dover we do not have the right to object to the population of our town being doubled or trebled through the construction of around 8,000 new homes within the coming twelve years, houses that would be built on farmland and woodland very close to our town, even on a designated Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and, indeed, on a Scheduled Ancient Monument on the White Cliffs overlooking Dover. To no avail the public outcry, the petitions, the local community groups that sprang up to campaign against such massive transformation of our local heritage.

How many communities in Britain must simply look on as developers arrive and bring in the bulldozers, cordoning off farms and landscape for new housing estates, all to accommodate the alarmingly high increase of our population due to mass immigration?
The only chance we had to oppose this was the original localism bill, whereby each community in Britain could have called for a local referendum on an important issue whenever we felt an issue significantly affected us. But the Government, breaking its promise, aborted this right, for they knew we would have put it to good use in our own community interests.

Parliament reneged on our rights to local democracy and now we have no say in our own future. Is it not time the People of our Country associate British Party with true democracy? Let's face it, the Localism Bill was a sad joke, but the cost of breaking a promise that would have meant so much to us all could never be repaid once our natural and national heritage is handed over while we all stand there and just look on.  

http://celticbritannia.blogspot.co.uk/2011/09/british-party.html

Written by D. Alexander

Objection to Dover District Council (DDC) Core Strategy 2013

The following is my representation to the Dover District Council objecting to the DDC core strategy, which I sent on 6^th February 2013.

This representation has been received and accepted by the Planning Office as relevant, therefore not rejected.

 

Objection:

I object to the DDC core strategy plans to have around 10,000 new homes built in and around Dover (including Whitfield) in the period to 2026, as the number of proposed houses, if built, would generate at least 10,000 more vehicles moving constantly in and out of Dover, in particular Dover town.

Currently Dover suffers under the influence of heavy air pollution stemming from various sources, among which are:

1. The continuous stream of traffic along Barton Road leading into Dover, Frith Road, Maison Dieu Road, Pencester Road, part of Biggin Street in the town centre, Priory Street, London Road (town centre) and Folkestone Road. As well as along Tower Hamlets Road.

2. The port traffic transiting along Townwall Street and Snargate Street.

3. The constant pollution coming from ferries operating at Eastern Docks.

4. Pollution coming across the Strait of Dover from Europe.

I am of the opinion that no consideration has been given to any proper air assessment in Dover, and that the 2008 DDC core strategy does not even take into account the existing levels of air pollution, let alone the inconvenience that would arise from the traffic ensuing from the building of around 10,000 more homes.

Many of Dover's schools, in fact even all of them, are situated in the immediate vicinity of roads with very high levels of chemical substances deriving from passing traffic.

Furthermore I am of the opinion that DDC has not properly and adequately informed Dover's residents of the very high risk to personal health caused by the high levels of chemical particles present in the air, and that, were the residents to be made aware of these unacceptable levels, the opposition to the core strategy would be far greater than it already has been.

In conclusion, I am of the opinion that DDC has downplayed the combined dangers to personal health caused by air pollution from local through-traffic, port activity and factory pollution from Europe, and that the building of almost 10,000 more homes in the Dover area would generate a significant increase in traffic heading in and out of Dover, which would bring on greater stress and a greater health risk to Dover's residents.

Therefore I ask Dover District Council to review the core strategy and implement a proper public consultation with due reference to health risks deriving both from existing levels of air pollution and from any future increase owing to more road traffic passing into Dover.

Adding to the present outlay of my representation, I further wish to point out that Dover Harbour Board has received permission from the Government to build a new ferry terminal at Western Docks, and that DHB's declared intentions are to build a terminal designed for road traffic, with an envisaged increase in car and lorry traffic of 70% passing through Dover over the coming 25 years.

Although in my representations to the Department for Transport (2010-2012) I have outlined the necessity for this new ferry terminal to be designed for rail traffic on account of Britain's carbon emission laws, there is as yet no indication from the DfT that my proposal has been accepted.

Following is some research data relevant to this representation:

From NHS Choices, April 23^rd 2012:

“Air pollution from exhaust fumes kills more than twice as many people as road accidents,” The Daily Telegraph has reported. The paper said that around 1,850 people die in traffic accidents annually, but that each year over 5,000 people will die as a result of heart attacks and lung cancer caused by vehicle exhaust fumes.

These estimates are based on a study that modeled the levels of pollution across the UK and predicted its impact on premature deaths. The study combined UK and EU emissions data with models of weather and the ways in which chemicals disperse. This allowed researchers to estimate the impact of pollution across the UK. According to the model, pollution from overall UK combustion emissions causes approximately 13,000 premature deaths a year, with road transport being the biggest source.

A further 6,000 deaths are estimated to be due to European Union emissions produced outside the UK.

The study was carried out by researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and was funded by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. The study was published in the journal Environmental Science and Technology.

The research was covered accurately in the newspapers.”

As can be seen from the data provided in the research and published on the NHS Choices website, air pollution in its various forms may account for 19,000 premature deaths every year in the United Kingdom.

As stated in the above points in my representation, Dover is massively exposed to all these factors: exhaust fumes from cars, from lorries and from ferries, and emissions from the European Union produced outside the UK.

Due to Dover's vicinity to the Continent, emissions from Europe are likely to affect Dover significantly more than other areas of Britain.

The building of around 10,000 new homes in the Dover area, or even just of several thousand new homes, combined with the prospect of a new ferry terminal designed to service an increase in road traffic from port activities, would drastically increase the health risk of Dover's residents to unsustainable levels.

Indeed we may assume that residents in Dover town already have a significantly lower life expectancy than residents in the nearby villages owing to our constant and daily exposure to road and port traffic.

In the sincere hope that Dover District Council will uphold my request that the core strategy be re-examined and presented to further Public Consultation on the basis of the points, considerations and research in my representation, I am keeping copy of this representation for any eventual use in future instances of Government involvement in the matter.

Yours sincerely,

D. Alexander

My representation is in response to the following public consultation made public in This Is Kent 02 January 2013:

“The Land Allocations Pre-Submission Local Plan identifies and allocates sites suitable for employment, retail and housing. It follows on from the district's Core Strategy blueprint for development until 2026.

The blueprint outlines proposals to build 14,000 homes across the district, with the main concentration at Whitfield, and predictions of creating 6,500 jobs, a population growth of 15,500 and the occupation of 50,000sq m of shopping space.

It also includes proposals for regeneration of the Dover Waterfront, Terminal 2, mid-town, Priory station, Connaught Barracks, Coombe Valley and Aylesham.

Transport, environmental, educational and public utility proposals also form part of the document which was first submitted to the Government for approval in 2008.

The Land Allocations document puts forward some 120 sites in addition to those already earmarked in the Core Strategy.

Sites from Alkham and Capel to Sandwich have been identified as areas where building could take place in the next two decades.

Proposed sites include the Western Heights; Stanhope Road; land between St Richard's Road and Ellens Road in Deal and smaller developments in Staple, Goodnestone and Worth.

Public comments can be made until midnight on February 21. The council will then submit these to the Planning Inspector who will appoint an independent Inspector to oversee an Examination, anticipated to be during summer 2013. The Inspector will recommend changes to the Plan or will reject it. If it is agreed, the council can then adopt it.”

DDC core strategy 2008 and the financial crash:

http://celticbritannia.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/ddc-core-strategy-and-financial-crisis.html

British Party: Speculation in the Economy

Greed and speculation are the ruin of the British economy.

Britain’s Crippled Economy

The economy in Britain is failing mainly due to speculation. Fundamental pillars of economic production have been closed down and transferred abroad, a process that started in the 1970s under a Conservative government and was brought to completion under a Labour government at the start of the 21st century.

As a result, almost all textiles and electronics sold in Britain are imported, as too are so many other products that once were produced in our Country. The reason is that UK High Street chain stores prefer to import products from the Far East that are produced at a wage of £30 to £60 a month.

This is speculation in one of its manifest forms, and results in millions of British people being unemployed. This unemployment costs the State tens of billions of pounds a year in unemployment-related benefits, and the money is either found through Government borrowing, causing the public debt to increase continually, or by increasing taxes, or by a combination of both. The ever-increasing public debt must be serviced with interest, which currently stands at about £50 billion a year. Again more taxes are required in order to pay the interest on the public debt!    

Millions of people and their families living on unemployment-related benefits in Britain live a life of deprivation. All this is a result of speculation that has crippled Britain’s economy, starting with Margaret Thatcher and ending with Tony Blair, when the dilapidation of the British productive economy was complete.  

Extortionate Interest Rates on Loans

The Law in Britain allows for extortionate interest rates on loans that equate to a pound of flesh. People in a desperate situation take on one of these loans because they are desperate, and others profiteer from their desperation by charging unholy interest rates.

The Government does not introduce legislation to stop this, because the money-lenders pay tax on their profits, and, as a result, a considerable amount of the extortionate interest paid on loans ends up in the State Treasury.

Bankers Bonuses, Share Company Executives Bonuses

Britain is renowned for the bonuses that the chief executives of large share companies, such as banks, pay themselves each year on top of their top-salaries. Tens of billions of pounds have been siphoned each year out of UK share companies and paid out as bonuses, often to the executives of these companies who are already on top salaries.

This form of bonus payment is sanctioned by the Government because these bonuses are taxed at about 50%, and so half the money taken by way of “bonuses” wanders into the State Treasury. Salaries above £150,000 a year have been taxed at the 50% rate, which is the highest tax bracket. From April 2013 the highest tax bracket is 45%, but this is still considerably higher than corporation tax paid on share companies' profits. 

The Government goes 50-50 with the chief executives in reducing the financial incomes of share companies, because in this way the Treasury has a greater tax intake from share companies' profits. If executives of share companies on top salaries could not give themselves a bonus, that money would be declared as profit for the company, and would be taxed accordingly, but at a significantly lower rate.
Thus there would be more money to pay out as dividends for the shareholders, or as interest for savers, or for further investment of share companies in the economy. 

Could one of the reasons for the banking crash of 2008 have been too much money going out of the banks as bonuses to "top up" top salaries of chief executives?

Is the Government complacent because this is a way to increment tax intake for the Treasury through the backdoor?  

Regulation of the Economy

British Party campaigns for a fair economy, regulated by laws that do not allow for speculation. Profits must be reasonable, and these may not be made by sacrificing the rights of the British People to participate in the economy and earn a fair wage.

Under the new Constitution, it would not be possible for profits to be made through extortionate interest rates inflicted on desperate people.  

Written by D. Alexander

British Party, for Britain's future:
http://celticbritannia.blogspot.co.uk/2011/09/british-party.html

Project Kentish House

Preliminary Proposed Constitution

1. Kentish House is a proposal for a community owned company operating in the County of Kent. It would be established by way of a founding constitution, with binding rules and regulations, with the declared intention of investing all contributing funds in the Kentish economy. Kentish House will offer work to local people living within the County of Kent, with the sole possible exception of employing people from further afield if these are required in order to offer skilled training to the local population in Kent.

2. Contributing funds will be considered as shares, there will be no private owners but only share-owners. Shares would only be issued at a set price and ideally will earn an annual dividend according to yearly profits achieved through the company's economic production. Shares could not fluctuate in value on a speculative basis, but their value could possibly increase in line with the rate of inflation. The company will not pursue any form of speculative trading with its shares, nor permit any shareholding member to do so.

A set percentage of profits from economic production, separate from dividends, would be used for further investment and expansion of the company within the Kentish economy.

3. The company will preferably avoid financial loans and depend on share investments of its members.

4. Individual people and groups would be able to invest in Kentish House and receive shares exactly according to their financial investment. There would be no bonuses to any share holder or any particular member or employed person, and all salaries are to be established according to the binding constitution of the company.

5. All investments and operations and forms of management will be transparent and accountable and will conform to the established laws of the United Kingdom.

Proposals and Objectives of Project Kentish House

The company will have several branches, the two major being agricultural and industrial.

The agricultural branch will use its funds to invest in farmland in Kent. This will be done by purchasing land and also renting available land from other owners at set contracts. Nurseries will be established within the County to produce fruit trees and also plants for other crops, including berries and vegetables, suitable for the Kentish climate and with preference given to traditionally local varieties.

Kentish House will cultivate plots of land in Kent and sell the produce, and will abide to a strict policy of preserving nature and avoiding the use of chemical insecticides.

The industrial branch will set about establishing production centres such as textile factories manufacturing material and the clothes made from it, footwear, furniture, and generally any form of civil manufacture that currently is imported into Britain but could be produced in Kent.

Agricultural and industrial products may be sold in Kent, in Britain and abroad at standard and fair prices that assure a reasonable wage to the employed workers and a reasonable profit. The company will not engage in unethical forms of production or in unfair trade either when producing and marketing at its own sites, or when buying materials and products from anywhere in the world for further use at its own production sites.

Kentish House will not invest in lands or factories outside Kent, and by its own constitution will be bound to offer training and employment to the local population of Kent. The company's policy will avoid unfair competition with other producers within the economy and will plan its production in accordance with demand for agricultural produce and industrial manufacture that is imported from abroad but could be produced in Kent. It will not aim to diminish the trade of other producers and manufacturers in the United Kingdom.

This is the preliminary outline of Project Kentish House. All aspects presented thus far are of preliminary nature and will need to be defined and approved according to current or future British law, including the event of the foreseeable exit of Britain from the European Union.

Kentish House is a project of British Party, presented in Dover, Kent.
celticbritannia.blogspot.com/2011/09/british-party.html  

Written by D. Alexander

The Tiny Global Village Called Speculation

How big money is made exploiting the Tiny Global Village.

A Window to Speculation

If you have ever asked why unemployment is rampant in Britain, as indeed in so many other western countries, look no further than speculation within the economy to find the answer. The easiest way to make big money is to buy a product for as little as possible, and then sell it for a huge profit. It is similar to giving out a loan at a huge interest rate.

Free Economy, Speculation, Austerity

The so-called free economy has allowed for Britain's manufacturing sector to be greatly depleted, to a large extent uprooted and closed down. This came about through speculation, finding ways to send millions of workers into unemployment and transferring Britain's traditional manufacture to countries where the cost of labour is fractional compared to the United Kingdom.

The result is austerity, with everything that is attached to austerity: unemployment, living off job-seekers allowance, borrowing money to pay for basic daily expenses, mortgaging the house, reverting to taking out payday loans at extortionate interest rates, home eviction, hunger.

Because the government system that allowed speculation to take over and destroy the economy is obviously not run by competent people, it should not really come as a surprise that these same governments over the years have mismanaged the State's finances and inflicted upon our Country an enormous Public Debt of over £1 trillion. Having at some point discovered this “rather insignificant” inconvenience, the Government then decided to inflict even more austerity by way of spending cuts, which go as far as cutting the Police Force and axing council budgets by as much as 40%, as well as axing hundreds of thousands of public sector jobs.

As a result, we have austerity coming from two directions: from personal and private bankruptcy, and from State bankruptcy. Needless to say, most banks also went bankrupt, having sunk into a world of speculative banking which had nothing to do with the real economy. The banks that became insolvent had invested the savers' money in toxic paper investments in other countries, and in government bonds of other countries, and in all sorts of fictitious and unrealistic paper assets readily available almost all over the globe.

Conquering the world in the name of speculation meant reaping fast and easy profits while earning top salaries, and adding to these big salaries even bigger bonuses, often many times higher than the actual salaries. As could have been expected, the banks crashed, as it was all based on speculation, on false economy, on greed, and mankind cannot conquer the world with greed.

High Street within the Global Village

As we all know, Britain's shops and supermarkets sell almost entirely products manufactured in cheap labour economies, sometimes at very low prices, and at times with enormous profit margins. This assures us mass unemployment, a conspicuous carbon footprint to transport just about everything from the other end of the world to Britain, a trade deficit and a Society dependent on benefits.

And those factories that are still operating in Britain often have a habit of employing cheap foreign labour on top of it all, thus guaranteeing British Society nothing more than a downtrodden place in the Global Village, with the Government planning to plaster over Britain's woodland and farmland to build millions of homes to accommodate mass immigration.

The workers on these building sites are commonly from Eastern Europe! So we have it all way round: unemployment, dependency on benefits, private debt, public debt, and to top it all, we will even lose our natural resources, the woods and the farmland, all sacrificed to the Global Village.

Yes, it seems as though the governing Establishment is rapidly transforming Britain into a one-off High Street within the Global Village, where developers and speculators and failed politicians will bury our remaining farms and woods under a tarmac of cement, while ensuring we have no manufacture either.

No manufacture, no agriculture, no woodland: is this the dismal destiny that awaits Britain?

And all in the name of speculation and big-money!

Written by D. Alexander

British Party: Trident and Nuclear Submarines

Britain's future Prosperity comes from High, through Jesus Christ.

Britain to Campaign for an End to Nuclear Arms

British Party trusts in the Church of Jesus Christ and recognises the Gospel as the basis for the Constitution. Britain will campaign for a world conference to discuss all nuclear disarmament, with no exceptions. No country in the world must have nuclear weapons. The sooner this comes about, the better.

This campaign will involve convincing people all over the world that nuclear weapons imply mass destruction and genocide. It is not within the Spirit of the Gospel to even contemplate destroying cities, regions and countries, let alone making active contingency plans to do so by way of nuclear strategy.

How much would Trident Nuclear Submarines Cost?

All counted, the Trident project would cost around one hundred billion pounds between submarines, nuclear missiles, maintenance and operating expenditure.

British Party opposes the plans of numerous political parties in Britain to renew the Trident nuclear submarine programme.

It is not within the spirit of the British Christian foundations to defy the Gospel and base military strategy on mass destruction of the Earth and of Mankind. To do so would alienate Britain from Prosperity, and this is the ultimate cost the Trident nuclear weapons system would incur. By defying Christ, we could be inflicting upon our Country the ultimate catastrophe, which is to lose Prosperity.

There is possibly no greater way to lose Prosperity than by following the road of planned destruction of the Earth and of Mankind. Hence British Party will oppose the schemes of numerous political parties in our Country to impose upon us a policy of sheer madness.

Head of Trident Nuclear Missiles

The declared head of Britain's Government and of Britain's Armed Forces is the house of Windsor, but British Party believes in the new Constitution and the refounded Union Flag, which is given from High and honours the Christian Faith.

The Head of the British Isles is Jesus Christ, and so the British Monarchy is Divine and Heavenly. It cannot belong to a mortal person or to a private family. Nuclear missile strategies come from mortal people attempting to impose an alienation of our Country from Prosperity.

British Party upholds the Christian Faith and holds to the Union Flag as our national Christian identity.

Trident: party divisions on nuclear deterrent 
http://news.sky.com/story/1116226/trident-party-divisions-on-nuclear-deterrent

Written by D. Alexander