Is the UK Government Trying to Infect Us with Ebola?

The Rapid Spread of Ebola in West Africa

The Ebola virus is spreading with alarming speed in three West African countries, and reports claim that by the end of the year 2014, as many as 1.4 million people could have become infected in the region.

The national health services in the affected countries, which are Liberia, Guinea and Sierra Leone, have reached breaking point, with clinics unable to treat the increasing number of people arriving with Ebola, or indeed with other ailments, and with hundreds of medical staff already dead after having contracted Ebola from the patients.

African Migrants Spreading all over Western Europe

Hundreds of thousands of Africans are entering Europe illegally each year, mainly through southern Italy, southern Spain and Greece.

Those coming from West Africa mainly enter through the Spanish enclaves in North Africa (Ceuta and Melilla). The migrants landing in Italy arrive after crossing the Mediterranean from starting points in Libya.

Once in Europe, whether entering through Greece, Italy or Spain, all migrants can claim asylum. They have leave to stay until their asylum case has been processed, which normally results in acceptance of their demand for asylum and takes around one year.

Once granted asylum, they are free to move anywhere within the European Union with the right to make a further asylum claim in any country of their choice, and in return receive free housing and a weekly welfare cheque. At this point, they can legally bring their whole extended family over, to be cared for free of any charge by the host country, with free housing and all social benefits, and a weekly cheque for every family member. They are exempt from finding work.      

African and Asian Migrants Stowed in Lorries Entering the UK

An increasingly large number of African and Asian migrants who have entered Europe and availed of European Union asylum, then head to the French port of Calais in an attempt to seek a second grant of asylum in Britain after reaching the Port of Dover. Many of these come from Africa, and their collective aim is to seek free accommodation for life in Britain and receive the life-long benefit cheque that will grant them perpetual assurance of a guaranteed income in return for doing absolutely nothing, apart from turning up on our shores.

Once they arrive in Britain after having entered the trailer of a lorry and concealed their presence, they then claim asylum and are immediately housed in a hotel at State expense, usually in London where hotel accommodation costs at least three times more than in other parts of Britain. They are immediately given money, and are free to go wherever they will while their asylum request is being processed.

This may take even years.

So Is the UK Government Doing Its Best to Infect Us with Ebola?

Considering that every day tens of thousands of lorries enter Britain without undergoing any form of border control owing to European Union open border policies, and considering also that the UK Government flatly refuses to introduce any border control on lorries entering the United Kingdom, the answer is yes. The British Government is definitely intent on wilfully exposing us to the Ebola virus, to which there is no known cure.

How Could Britain Protect Itself From an Ebola Outbreak?

To answer this question, we must first wait till the Government has wilfully allowed Ebola to enter our Country, then we will find an answer. 

But it will be too late then.

Written by D. Alexander

Ebola Is Airborne
http://celticbritannia.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/ebola-is-airborne.html

When Is Ebola Going to Hit Britain?
http://celticbritannia.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/when-is-ebola-going-to-hit-britain.html

The Ebola Time Bomb Coming to Britain:
http://celticbritannia.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/the-ebola-time-bomb-coming-to-britain.html

Ebola may soon Hit Northern Africa
http://celticbritannia.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/ebola-may-soon-hit-northern-africa.html

The Chilcot Inquiry and Censoring of Freedom of Speech in Britain

Press Censoring of the Chilcot Report

In Britain, the Chilcot report has been reduced to silence. Once again this is Establishment cover-up of yet another scandal.

I have publicly demanded that the Chilcot inquiry be made known, but my request has been repeatedly and systematically censored from the online comments section under relevant news articles.

This is the statement that is object of repeated censoring: 

Why has the Chilcot report not been made public?

Parliament is covering T. Blair and this does not correspond to the Constitution concerning a British public inquiry.

As a British citizen I publicly demand the right to see the Chilcot report in its unedited version.

Establishment Cover-up

I repeat my demand that the Chilcot report be made public now, as it is a British public inquiry. Silence is consent, I have not consented to the covering up of a public inquiry in Britain and will not accept news censoring of my legitimate demand.  

Written by D. Alexander

White Genocide in Britain

Well here is one example of what I consider potential genocide:

I live in Kent, which is known as the Garden of England. In my district (Dover District), the council's core strategy (still awaiting approval) envisages the building of over 14,000 more houses by 2026. Our district population is around 100,000, so this would imply migration to our area of tens of thousands of people within just 12 years from now.

We do have plenty of empty houses for sale and for rent, and even empty shops, so clearly there is no lack of accommodation for the local residents or for people who might wish to move here. Indeed this can be ascertained by simply looking at the available housing in the many estate agencies here.

My point of reasoning is as follows:

a significant increase in the population MUST require a proportionate increase in farming to supply food. However, the new homes would be built on farm and woodland, even on an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and on a Scheduled Ancient Monument area (Western Heights Napoleonic defences).

Meanwhile, the Government has designated the WHOLE of Dover District for fracking of shale gas AND shale oil, because the energy resources Britain currently relies upon are dwindling.

So, if some time in the future we had a worldwide - or regional - weather disaster, such as prolonged floods or drought, or volcanic ashes from Iceland causing a drastic drop in temperature (which researchers believed happened at some point in the Bronze Age), we could find ourselves with MANY more people living here due to mass migration policies to our area, and LESS farm and woodland to cater for our food requirements and to absorb torrential rains.

Add to this, that the 2010 election promise to introduce the Localism Bill that would enable BINDING referendums on important local issues, such as urban/rural development, was totally scrapped in November 2011 in the House of Lords.

So NO democratic vote on our future, on whether we actually WANT such a massive influx of migration to our area.

Yes, we could be faced with even mass destruction of our soil through mass-fracking for shale gas and shale oil. Yes we could die a collective death! 

Written by D. Alexander

Scotland and the Public Debt

Scotland’s Vote on Independence

Scotland is preparing to vote on separation from the rest of the current Union of Britain. If the majority chose independence from Westminster, would the Government of a depleted Union try to impose a share of the public (or national) debt on Scotland? The figure could amount to around £130 billion, which is 10% of the national debt. If so, Scotland would be bankrupted from the start.

Britain’s public debt is £1.3 trillion; that is one thousand three hundred billion pounds. One billion is one thousand million, so we have a picture of what our national debt looks like. Distributed among everyone resident in Britain, that would be around twenty thousand pounds per person, adult or child without exception.

Impossible to Pay the Public Debt

It is impossible to repay this sum, and indeed in 2014 Britain will pay around £60 billion alone on interest on the national debt. Since the Coalition came to power in May 2010, this debt has increased by 80%, and it is steadily going up. It is estimated that by May 2015, in time for the next general election, it will have doubled since 2010.

This debt bubble will burst when the Government - whichever government that be – decides to officially declare the State insolvent. This will mean that Britain will default on repayment of government bonds, which constitute the national debt. The reason is that further austerity to cut state spending would rapidly bring Britain into the situation Greece is in and even worse. And there is no bailout forthcoming as most countries in Europe are in a similar situation to Britain with an enormous national debt, as too is the United States of America, where the debt has surpassed the $17 trillion mark.

As the national debt rises, so too will the annual interest the State must pay. Government bonds earn nearly 5% a year on interest, which is almost three times higher than Britain’s current 2% rate of inflation.  

Scotland Would Gain Nothing

Will Scotland accept to take on a share of Westminster’s public debt sheet? To do so would be tantamount to bankrupting the Scottish Nation. To remain a part of the current Union implies bankruptcy anyway. So what is the point in breaking away if that means transferring to Scotland an immense burden that the Country could never pay off, a ball and chain the weight of which would increase exponentially, as it does anyway under Westminster’s governance? 
There would be no point in it!

If Scotland kept the English pound it would make the Country liable to the national debt that is attached to this currency. While in theory Scottish oil and gas revenues would no longer go directly to Westminster’s treasury, taking on a share of Britain’s national debt, however, would sponge away all these revenues and much more. In fact, a significant part of Scottish revenues would be needed to service Westminster’s public debt requirements. Alone the interest on a £130 billion Scottish share of the public debt would require Scotland handing over six and a half billion pounds a year to the British Treasury.

Written by D. Alexander

How the British Economy Makes Lots of Money

The following is a brief guide on how money is made:

You need a central bank, plenty of paper and some ink. A silver lining through each note and a watermark will distinguish it from monopoly money.

An even quicker way is to type in some figures on a keyboard that will transmit to a computer’s hard disk, and the central bank has just created digital money. Since January 2009, the Bank of England created £375 billion in digital money using precisely this method.

Sadly, the British economy is calculated in terms of how to make money, lots of it, and very quickly. It is one reason why City bankers can give themselves big salaries and top them up once a year with even bigger bonuses. They may cause the banks to crash, as happened in 2007 and 2008, and so-by risk causing the whole economy to crash too. 
But when this happens, the Bank of England, which is our central bank, will use some paper and ink, or a keyboard, to replenish the banks and the economy, and everything will return to normal: top salaries, bonuses and the high life of Riley. These salaries in fact will be increased with a vengeance, so the City bankers will always come out of it on top.

So now we know how to make plenty of money. It’s so easy, it’s a joke.

What Is this Money Worth?

The money circulated by the Bank of England is not really worth anything, because it has nothing to back it, meaning it is not even worth the paper it is printed on. Then there is the fact that hundreds of billions of pounds of it is digital, whereby it exists only on computer screens animated by a hard disk.     

If you had gone to an English market stall one hundred years ago and tried purchasing some items with a piece of paper worth nothing, they would have positively believed you were cracking a joke. You’d have been expected to pay with silver coins, copper coins, or a banknote to which corresponded a set amount of gold stored away in a vault in the Bank of England.

As it stands today, our money does not correspond to any assets which can guarantee its value, meaning the British State is printing money that is worth nothing. Although the Bank of England does hold around $15 billion US worth of our national gold reserves (around £10 billion), this amount would only suffice to cover a fraction of the currency in circulation in Britain. By contrast, the British Treasury does hold £1.3 trillion in public debt!

France and Italy each hold gold reserves about eight times higher than Britain does, even though the population of each of these countries is about the same as Britain’s. Germany’s gold reserves are even greater, and all Eurozone countries together could probably prop up their common currency, the euro, with enough gold to prevent it from crashing in time of a financial crisis, which could happen if confidence in paper currencies suddenly collapsed.

Britain’s pound, though, would be in a woeful position. It would literally fall to shreds on the currency exchange, imports would become extremely expensive including oil and gas, and even a Chinese T shirt would become unaffordable.

Confidence in the Present Monetary System

We need to understand that most of the money in circulation in Britain has not been printed – either in paper form or in a digital version – by the Bank of England, but has been “created” and lent out in the form of loans by commercial banks, meaning that commercial banks electronically create money that does not, at least in theory, really exist.

This particular detail is important, especially if we consider that the pound’s value in relation to other currencies is calculated in accordance with the amount of pounds issued by the central bank, which is the Bank of England, and not in relation to the amount of pounds “created” by the commercial banks.

So we know the secret to creating lots of money, it’s quite simple: the Bank of England and the commercial banks do it all the time. We should also have understood that this money is guaranteed by the sole paper it is printed on, or by a computer’s hard disk, plus a gigantic public debt of £1.3 trillion, and an official private debt also of £1.3 trillion. Actually the private debt in Britain is believed to be a lot higher.

All this does not inspire confidence, so we may legitimately accept that our present monetary system could simply fall down overnight like a pack of cards once the door opens and a slight breeze enters the room. That is, once confidence in monopoly-style money is no longer forthcoming.

Written by D. Alexander

Britain's Economic Recovery Prediction:
http://celticbritannia.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/britains-economic-recovery-prediction.html

Crimea Is Now Part of Russia

On Thursday 6^th March 2014, the Crimean Parliament voted in favour of Crimea becoming a part of Russia. The decree is with immediate effect, meaning that Ukraine has no jurisdiction within Crimean territory.

The Crimean Parliament also decreed that on 16^th March 2014 a referendum shall be held in Crimea on the issue, and that this will serve to ratify the decision already taken by the Crimean Parliament.

Thursday, the Day Crimea Returned to Russia

Thursday 6^th March 2014 is the day Crimea’s Parliament democratically voted to end Ukrainian rule over Crimean territory, so on 16^th March the People of Crimea will be voting on Russian soil to ratify their Parliament’s decree. They will be asked whether they want their land to remain Russian soil, or to become Ukrainian.

Written by D. Alexander

Update

On 16th March 2014, well over 80% of the population of Crimea turned out to vote in the referendum, and 96% of the voters chose Russia as their Motherland, voting for the reunification of Crimea with Russia.

Within days the Russian Parliament welcomed back Crimea to Russia.

Britain and Russia are Allied Nations. Our Christian Faith is essential in the Alliance between our British Motherland and the Russian Motherland.
No-one can break these ties! 

Forecasting Britain’s Imminent Financial Collapse

The End of the Union of Britain

The increase of Britain’s national debt is many times higher than the inflation rate. This debt has gone up by around 80% from May 2010 to February 2014. Our national debt has passed from around £750 billion to almost £1.3 trillion in less than four years. 

The annual interest on government bonds is almost 5%, so in 2010 we paid around £35 billion on interest on our national debt. In 2014 it will be around £60 billion, and that is just the interest. You will notice that the increase in the public debt is way above the annual inflation rate of 3%, and well above the 5% interest rate on government bonds. This is proof that the Chancellor is utterly out of touch with reality and has been taking us all for a ride for almost four years.

Now have you tried calculating the entity of Britain’s imminent financial crash? It is simple: look no further than Scotland for the answer. In fact, the current Union of Britain may break up in order to avoid the burden of the public debt.  

Scotland to Wave Good-Bye to National Debt

Why would Alex Salmond be so keen to keep the English pound in an independent Scotland? Well he knows the answer from Westminster will be negative, so he feigns betrayal and declares that if Scotland cannot keep the English pound sterling after independence, Scotland will not be obliged to partake in a share of Britain’s public debt. Genius!

Yes, Alex Salmond knows that Britain’s public debt, currently at £1.272 trillion, that is one trillion and 272 billion English pounds, is impossible to service, and he has worked out the stratagem to relieve Scotland of any participation in Britain’s coming financial crash. He doesn’t really want Parliament in London to accept his demand for Scotland to keep the Bank of England pound; instead he wants an excuse for Scotland to be relieved of this burden – by none other than English leaders – and Scotland will be debt-free!

British Parliament have already stated that an independent Scotland cannot keep the English pound, and Mr. Salmond has already made clear that Scotland, consequently, will not inherit any part of Britain’s national debt.

Of-course Scotland’s economy would flourish after an independence vote with no English pound and no public debt. But does anyone seriously believe that the Coalition of jokers that would govern the rest of this Country of ours will be able to continue increasing the public debt and inflicting on us an annual payment – in interest alone – of £60 billion, £75 billion, £90 billion … as each year passes? 

Let’s not forget that the public debt increases at a level way above inflation. Indeed what remained of Britain would inherit Scotland’s share in the national debt, and that could be around £130 billion. The North Sea oil and gas revenues, however, could no longer be used to increment the national Treasury in London, as they would go to Scotland exclusively.

The Government to Confiscate British Savings?

So how long will it take before a desperate government in London decides to enact the Cyprus experiment and confiscate all personal savings above, let’s say, £20,000? Currently there is an EU law allowing the government to confiscate all private savings that exceed 100,000 euro or the equivalent, which in Britain is about £87,000. So the law is already there to go ahead and do it.

Alex Salmond is not a stupid man. He is a cunning statesman who has found a way to detract Scotland from the guaranteed financial collapse that shall visit Britain in the very near future. But we south of the Wall will be left with a pack of 52 jokers, plus two more jokers, the PM and the Chancellor.

The public debt will not be solved by confiscating private savings above £87,000, and not even above £20,000. It would just be a respite to the clueless Treasurer in London and the Prime Minister to hold out for a few more years until the national debt is back there again where it was, at well over one trillion pounds.  

Will England Leave the Union?

So now we may ask the question whether England’s shires will leave the Union too. We could all leave the national debt to the City of London and Buckingham Palace, we could run our own affairs and need not send a penny to a bankrupt Treasury. 

We would prosper! 

The British Union needs to be founded anew, but without the present Establishment 

Written by D. Alexander

How the British economy makes lots of money
http://celticbritannia.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/how-british-economy-makes-lots-of-money.html